# Tané Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/1 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")
![icon_vertical_logo](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/uploads/arbitrum1/original/2X/c/c24f99b7e88e3edac9cb5a09a5cbf1ee55c54b1c.png) **Delegate Address:** 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 **Delegate ENS Address:** tanegov.eth **On-chain Voting Activities (Tally):** [Tané - tanegov.eth's Delegate Profile](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/delegate/0xb79294d00848a3a4c00c22d9367f19b4280689d7) **Off-chain Voting Activities (Snapshot):** [https://snapshot.org/#/profile/0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7](https://snapshot.org/#/profile/0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7) **X (Twitter):** [https://x.com/tanelabs](https://x.com/tanelabs) * * * > [@Delegate Statement Template](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/delegate-statement-template/31/1184): > > Name Tané (Organization) Wallet Address or ENS tanegov.eth | 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 Tally Profile [https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/delegate/0xb79294d00848a3a4c00c22d9367f19b4280689d7](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/delegate/0xb79294d00848a3a4c00c22d9367f19b4280689d7)What area are you most interested in contributing to? Improving Governance participation Supporting Infrastructure Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO Intro to Tané Tané is formed with a group of crypto-native product builders, based in Tokyo, Dubai and New York. We are b… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/2 "2024-05-27T18:39:49Z")
### STIP Addendum Snapshot Proposals | Protocol | Vote | Reasoning | | --- | --- | --- | | Thetanuts Finance | Approve funding | The STIP incentives were clearly effective as TVL has been stable after the program, the expansion of the incentive use makes sense, and the concerns from the challenge have been surely addressed by the team. | | Umami Finance | Approve funding | The incentive seemed to work out well, and the team is planning to allocate the bridged incentive more effectively through their experimentation. | | Dolomite | Approve funding | The incentive seemed to create a sustainable growth and the reasonable amount of the bridged incentive will be used to further the growth. | | Thales Protocol | Approve funding | The incentive worked out quite well as clearly seen with comparisons with its Optimism and Base deployments and concerns from the challenge are appropriately addressed. | | Savvy DAO | Approve funding | The incentives clearly attracted users into the protocol and kept them in the protocol. Tweaking the mechanism via the protocol users’ interviews are sound. Concerns from the challenge doesn’t seem to be a blocker. | | Stargate | Abstain | Due to potential CoI with investments in our portfolio bridge protocol | | Gains Network | Approve funding | The concerns from the challenge are no longer considered issues. | | Solv Protocol | Approve funding | The incentive seemed to work well and it makes sense to continue funding for them to grow the protocol with an additional change to a new BTC related offering. | | ANGLE | Reject funding | While we understand they improve the method and reporting process, we don’t consider a complete shift to the red-ocean USD stablecoin market is qualified for a bridge funding. | | Mux Protocol | Approve funding | With the additional context provided for the TVL increase, the additional bridged incentives can continue to increase the use of the protocol, which contributes to the Arbitrum ecosystem. Good sybil resistance system can also be shared with other protocols for future applicants too. | | Sanko GameCorp | Approve funding | The incentives with points and seasons system seemed to work for the user growth and protocol revenue. Continuous funding makes sense to support novel protocols in the Arbitrum ecosystem. | | OpenOcean | Reject funding | The retained increases in the metrics are not as significant to continue a bridge funding to the protocol. | | KyberSwap | Approve funding | As the most of the allocation has been returned after the unfortunate incident, we believe it makes sense to fund the protocol to assess the results without any disturbance. | | Boost | Approve funding | We consider the Boost case is really interesting and great one for the DAO to learn from. The introduction of the sybil detection is appreciated. We’d love to see the results from the new approach by an additional funding. | | Stake DAO | Reject funding | The team seemed to agree to delay the funding request later. | | Socket | Abstain | Due to potential CoI with investments in our portfolio bridge protocol | | Tide Protocol | Reject funding | Clearly missed the target metrics and we are not certain somewhat revised plans will improve the trajectory in a significant way. | | Furucombo | Reject funding | Concerns from the challenge didn’t seem to be addressed. A sudden increase in the ask without clear track record and execution plans shouldn’t be justified. | ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [June 6, 2024, 8:34pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/3 "2024-06-06T20:34:56Z")
### [Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x285a0ef00fabce6e1d44b10ffff9fff5a30f62649339cfeded113e23bc58cdf1) Summary: Set up a sub-committee called Security Services Subsidy Fund (‘SSSF’), seeking 60,000 ARB to fund members that are be tasked with administering $2.5 million worth of ARB and selecting the security service providers most deserving of a subsidy fund based on the Means Test outlined in the [Subsidy Fund Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-subsidy-fund-for-security-services/22958). Voting: **Against** Reasoning: We also believe the ADPC can handle the operations and the governance minimization matters especially in the Arbitrum DAO. If the ADPC didn’t account for the operations, we’d consider an additional small funding can be an option. ### [AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4ad37b12ffe5c334e0c19113ac54222983e18d36a255fbde60e483592f35fc65) Summary: A new system will be implemented to streamline the fee transfer permissionless-ly from Nova to the DAO tresuary. Voting: **For** Reasoning: We consider it rather a fix to apply the change and simplify the fee related operations for the DAO. ### [AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x330ed0f609da63cf4b67b932ab0665a76e1c7d6a7789f3383339bad79c789d2b) Summary: Stylus is the new technology that supports programming languages other than Solidity on Arbitrum and achieves cheaper execution on Arbitrum compatible chains. Voting: **For** Reasoning: Stylus is an ambitious, yet reasonable innovation that Offchain Labs has developed to make Arbitrum even more attractive to Rust and C++ developers. We’d hope that the technology will be integrated into other L2 chains so that the smart contract composability will remain as we have on the EVM platforms. ### [AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x2f73825f375d59a5d3c8b05074e17140a4967e6ccb6fe20a58f836f865fcaae5) Summary: RIP-7212 is the first Rollup Improvement Proposal adopted by the broader Ethereum ecosystem to introduce a new precompile for verifying the [secp256r1 curve](https://www.nervos.org/knowledge-base/what_is_secp256r1) on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. Voting: **For** Reasoning: RIP-7212 has been well-supported by the community and other L2 will certainly introduce it on their chains. This enables more secure smart wallets to be easily utilized on the L2 environments, which is a clear win for the better UX. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [June 13, 2024, 2:48am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/4 "2024-06-13T02:48:27Z")
### [Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/53472400873981607449547539050199074000442490831067826984987297151333310022877) > [@Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368/206): > > We maintain the vote on its Snapshot and vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We appreciate all the effort by the contributors for the past 6 months and believe in the needs to focus more on building strong ecosystem in the gaming category. There are obviously a few concerns that were already discussed in the thread and the X Space held today, but we are confident that the appointed GCP council, GCP team and Foundation incorporate feedback from the DAO and advisors and appropriately oversee the prog… ### [ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/38701323908152171422214887490453506732497504710759730413296983575898180294585) > [@Proposal \[Non-Constitutional\]: Defending Open Source: A United Stand for Developer Rights and Software Freedom](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-defending-open-source-a-united-stand-for-developer-rights-and-software-freedom/23047/59): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintained our Snapshot vote to fund 500k ARB each as we are generally supportive of the initiative and consider it important for the Arbitrum DAO to contribute to the cause. ### [Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/108365944612843449282647711225577270624871742641825297712833904029381791489297) > [@Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-security-council-improvement-proposal/20541/35): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintained the vote from Snapshot as we believe increasing the threshold to 9/12 is the vital first step to improve the system to achieve the revised Stage1 designation. ### [Election of STEP Program Manager](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x991f18a73526fb5715b41e37f7460ced511c02cf3470d41cdaf97656c794406b) > [@STEP Program Manager Applications](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-program-manager-applications/23390/20): > > We vote 50% for Steakhouse and 50% for Avantgarde. We chose Stakehouse because their extensive experience and track record stand out quite a bit. We believe the higher fee is justified with the outcomes that they should be able to bring. We also chose Avantgarde because of their expertises and their balanced fee structure. We believe both entities should be able to offer great services as the first Arbitrum STEP Program Manager. ### [[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x09d16f8726f1f9a85bd6975587947a2cd7ce6bd438750d52866ae36207ac7ded) > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Venture Initiative](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247/39): > > We vote FOR [NO IRL Event]. We appreciate the AVI team’s effort and approach to address feedback from the delegates. While we still believe potential overlap would be found through the course and as DAO, we need to evaluate if this initiative should be prioritized and funded in a big scale after the pilot phase, the budget ask is reasonable enough for a capable and passionate team to start the pilot phase to explore the opportunities. ### [AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x98a2b1eebda641b31d7d22a60708840ec7899157e00a4028f2e9f3030ddaf7a8) > [@AIP: BOLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-bold-permissionless-validation-for-arbitrum/23232/57): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. BoLD unlocks permissionless validations for the Arbitrum chains, which is a great step for the DAO and a technological feat provided by Offchain Labs. While we need to review the economical incentive that is also sustainable for a more diversified set of operators to join in the future, we are in 100% support of the proposal and implementation of it as it stands. ### [AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Bond sentiment](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x81cc53932edd0891c8f93a502a1ea929ba1ef1ebf76701663c52d5167b323a6d) and [AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Operational cost sentiment](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x9a4800da3ebd6792a59f02d70467fc6ae158ec2d3d1d941cf095a54cb7c7f0d5) > [@AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-funds-to-bootstrap-the-first-bold-validator/24506/20): > > We vote FOR the two proposals related to funding the first BoLD validator on Snapshot. Regarding bond funding, it makes sense to support the Foundation to bootstrap the first BoLD validator as the trusted and honest party. It’s also great to confirm that the Foundation will equip themselves with a team of operators running a node with help from Offchain Labs. Regarding operational cost subsidizing, it makes sense to subsidize the first operator running the BoLD validator and cover the operatio… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [June 25, 2024, 3:26am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/5 "2024-06-25T03:26:15Z")
### [[Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb57f04ac3afb432ddbc7d4426f80bdca9191e56bee97cf5b7d9d55cd9fdf9752) (Snapshot) > [@Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/betting-on-builders-infinite-launchpad-proposal/24665/39): > > We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. We appreciate all the materials, FAQ and comments to address feedback from delegates, especially shout out to @aminiman and @danielo. We simply believe it crams all the conceptual ideas into one proposal with a high operational cost without track record or clear and foreseeable deliberables to be proven to the stakeholders in Arbitrum, while understanding the reasoning behind all of them into one. We also believe what to aim to achieve is valid and bro… ### [Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/79183200449169085571205208154003416944507585311666453826890708127615057369177) (Onchain) > [@Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives (UPDATED)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/kwenta-x-perennial-arbitrum-onboarding-incentives-updated/22736/64): > > We missed on-chain voting but we were to vote FOR the proposal as we maintained the vote on Snapshot. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 1, 2024, 2:01am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/6 "2024-07-01T02:01:44Z")
### [ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x2af945c5c65a4904e5c3f92be99aef47dc36aacfa2b64c61cf03e7f2a0a45b94) (Snapshot) > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857/49): > > We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While we believe the concept and initial implementation of the hub is useful and good for the community, we don’t agree with how the compensations are calculated per tasks rather than each member. We understand the works required to maintain the service from the experience that we have but as other delegates expresses, the cost presented isn’t justified for the outcome we anticipate. Milestone based approaches would be better, but eventually it would co… ### [Multisig Support Service (MSS) Elections](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4f6f6c1ba11de1122d5d5b8b098999610920fdc9c61a5e775ea09fbb4bdffc1b) (Snapshot) > [@\[RFC\] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/59): > > We vote to select the members below based on their contributions, and the fact that they have deep knowledge and context about the DAO: PGov Limes.eth JoJo Cattin Ultra Sinkas Serious People StableLab Disruption Joe Frisson 404 DAO Alex Lumley ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2024, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/7 "2024-07-10T04:35:37Z")
### [Approval of STEP committee recommendations](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x0e6052ecf62577ec99ee7f1312c6c56ccbfc8599304b6f8c324888da0a5ab97e) (Snapshot) > [@STEP Committee Recommendations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-committee-recommendations/25097/25): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe the program is a great step to experiment the treasury diversification and trust the committee’s recommendations of the providers. We are also curious about the reporting mechanism and how the DAO can continuously review how the investments work. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 17, 2024, 3:00pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/8 "2024-07-17T15:00:34Z")
### [Improving Predictability in Arbitrum DAO’s Operations](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x249a8e8aef5dc59da18b72e7d14ace5197ec6242675ab7f82b3d3f17f71bb13b) (Snapshot) > [@Improving Predictability in Arbitrum DAO’s Operations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/improving-predictability-in-arbitrum-dao-s-operations/25136/44): > > We vote FOR “Predicability, Approval Process” and “Improving Predicability” as the next choice. As described in our feedback to the original proposal, we had concerns on the approval process and criteria but Entropy team provided the updated proposal, which is reasonable to us, and since we see the Optimism Collective has applied this system in a slightly different form and it works to some extent, we believe it’s worth trying it at least as a trial. We also understand that the current form wor… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 17, 2024, 3:01pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/9 "2024-07-17T15:01:18Z")
### [[Non-Constitutional] - Subsidy Fund Proposal from the ADPC](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/3552942192106351362095426680857341385146921274641698065112264407057470303359) (Onchain) > [@\[Non-constitutional\] Subsidy Fund for Security Services](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-subsidy-fund-for-security-services/22958/59): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We voted for the option, “8 weeks and $2.5M fund” and maintain the stance for the onchain proposal. It’s critical for the DAO to allocate the fund for the smaller projects with security considered. We also appreciate the ADPC team for accommodating the feedback from the delegates and pushing through the proposal to get started. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2024, 3:57pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/10 "2024-07-22T15:57:55Z")
### [Pilot for a Questbook Jumpstart fund for problem definition and DAO improvement](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd096c5d610d4455bcae4bff719d18345939c5d6b20d56c6a1f37d0247ad10f71) (Snapshot) > [@Jumpstart fund for DAO improvement](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/jumpstart-fund-for-dao-improvement/25557/43): > > We vote FOR the proposal (without playbook) on Snapshot. As DisruptionJoe described, this can work in collaboration with the Firestarters program in the form of a Questbook grant program that requires a domain allocator elected by the DAO to manage the fund. We would like plurality in this kind of problem areas and look forward to seeing more quality proposals on critical issues/problems created by the programs. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2024, 9:27pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/11 "2024-07-30T21:27:27Z")
### [Change Arbitrum Expansion Program to allow deployments of new Orbit chains on any blockchain](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd6138aaca39742a1a56f3219a74a4258e0786aa5494cdfbe752f23277c1b947f) > [@Temperature Check: Change Arbitrum Expansion Program to allow deployments of new Orbit chains on any blockchain](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/temperature-check-change-arbitrum-expansion-program-to-allow-deployments-of-new-orbit-chains-on-any-blockchain/23280/33): > > We vote FOR the proposal. Economically and practically, allowing new Orbit chains on any blockchain that demand the technology built by OCL and managed by the Foundation and DAO makes sense. We believe it’s beneficial especially for more Stylus uses, which will lead to the world where developers can easily deploy their applications on the established environment. However, since Arbitrum is Ethereum-aligned as clearly stated as its first community value, the Foundation and OCL should still prio… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2024, 12:20am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/12 "2024-08-01T00:20:39Z")
### [Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xfd4085bda4daaa79445627ac2886656cdc1ef90cfbe0e8b82f955773cbfd4290) (Snapshot) > [@GCP Council Nominations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gcp-council-nominations/25093/46): > > We allocate our voting power equally as below: David Bolger: An obvious choice. His experience and context are much needed for the role as a Growth / BD Expert. Karthik Raju: As a Venture Expert, he stands out the most and is best suitable for the role. Greg Canessa: He has the most relevant experiences when it comes to supporting the GCP initiative as an Operations Expert. Devansh Mehta: His contributions to the STEP were impressive and we recognize him as a great addition as a Gov Expert f… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2024, 2:55am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/13 "2024-08-01T02:55:43Z")
### [Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x3161a3d9486ab7b6099be9fda16d6498f329249c0ad33b0f75090f2ceb557789) (Snapshot) > [@Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-arbitrum-dao/25246/58): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe the dedicated and capable actor that focuses on operations, strategy alignment and key coordinations is clearly demanded in the DAO governance, and Entropy has proven to be the one in Arbitrum. We are very excited to have them exclusively work with Arbitrum DAO. We have similar concerns about the hiring part, which is rare for this kind of proposals. We would ask them to consider a short-term pilot project with the currently hired or to-be-hired… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:49am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/14 "2024-08-07T04:49:52Z")
### [[Non-constitutional] Incentives Detox Proposal](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x99b57df3577e8e6561f3549b057bd87fdb7e66f65a7c45fddf63d9cd62f993d8) (Snapshot) > [@\[RFC\] Incentives Detox Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-incentives-detox-proposal/25849/38): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We consider the STIP (and its bridge) and LTIPP are purely experiments that need deep analysis and considerations for its complete version of the mechanism. To do so, the DAO requires dedicated resources including time, thus having the detox period makes perfect sense. We appreciate the work by all the contributors including L2BEAT, Matt from StableLab, the LTIPP council members and advisors, so far and in the future. As dk3 suggested, we would also sugges… ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 12, 2024, 9:28pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/15 "2024-08-12T21:28:22Z")
### [[Constitutional] ArbOS 31 “Bianca” (Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, Nova Fee Router)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/108288822474129076868455956066667369439381709547570289793612729242368710728616) (Onchain) > [@AIP: ArbOS 31 “Bianca” - Activation of Arbitrum Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, & Nova Fee Router Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-arbos-31-bianca-activation-of-arbitrum-stylus-rip-7212-support-nova-fee-router-proposal/25904/17): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain our rationales below for each individual update and support a package of those updates to be deployed as “Bianca”. We appreciate the proper audits on each implementation and OpenZeppelin’s reviews as a part of ARDC works. We are particularly excited to see Stylus finally going live! ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 12, 2024, 9:46pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/16 "2024-08-12T21:46:35Z")
### [Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/47904929527582233304785161920776863155691990219898799848510210794906211250836) (Onchain) > [@\[RFC\] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/75): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain the rationale below on this proposal and continue to support the selected members to act as the guardians of the Arbitrum Multi-sig. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2024, 7:47pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/17 "2024-08-14T19:47:33Z")
### [Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd54c3dd8f27a9baef80c92189e63f06a6cb905e296be0b55dfaa8835a3b75127) (Snapshot) > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains on growthepie.xyz Allowing Data-Driven Decision Making](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-transparency-and-standardized-metrics-for-orbit-chains-on-growthepie-xyz-allowing-data-driven-decision-making/25911/37): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. After [our initial comment](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-transparency-and-standardized-metrics-for-orbit-chains-on-growthepie-xyz-allowing-data-driven-decision-making/25911/5), there have been more clarifications, discussions and affirmations (on the cost by other data tool providers) that make this proposal appealing and we are convinced of potential returns that this analytics tools can provide in the long run. Especially the development cost of the foundation is considered reasonable and promising for future marketing uses that would lead to more developers and users on the Arbitrum ecosystem. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2024, 8:00pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/18 "2024-08-14T20:00:24Z")
### [ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb581f3aed701ae889c1d79406acdf3d653e6eb4323cb5e46635f729e6313da4d) (Snapshot) > [@ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084/117): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We maintain the directional support that was made in [our comment](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084/9) and recognize all the changes made by incorporating the feedback from the delegates. We are excited about the power and benefits that Tally Protocol can bring and further improvements to be made on the Arbitrum DAO governance and alignments between stakeholders. ### [ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x573c74706924ce482080ba44deb77d75e8d6bdb516fbbdee54b78861c1683f1b) (Snapshot) > [@\[RFC\] ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrumdao-governance-analytics-dashboard/25869/41): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe better understanding of the governance and delegates is critical for the DAO to improve its governance and evaluate the ongoing programs (e.g. Delegate Incentive Program). Regarding the overlap on the tools, we consider the proposed dashboard is more for retroactive analysis on the governance while Karma is to capture snapshots of how the delegates perform, thus they can exist and complement each other. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2024, 8:24am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/19 "2024-08-21T08:24:59Z")
### [Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x24188af307bee6ce66d10394d03d501746b343a686d64806ee71954e317ed382) > [@Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/should-the-dao-default-to-using-shielded-voting-for-snapshot-votes/25884/41): > > We vote For Elections Only. While we acknowledge the beauty of transparency of ongoing Snapshot votes, having shielded voting for elections would outweigh the benefit which encourages voters to vote on their preferred choices rather than following the current top choices. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [August 21, 2024, 2:08pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/20 "2024-08-21T14:08:57Z")
### [Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x0e646ace733f4a098ac7036dbadad8465ea65c8e3c485e014501d41b7b439d87) (Snapshot) > [@Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/28): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. It’s critical to keep the incentivized delegates who are actively contributing to the important DAO decision makings motivated with a short-term extension. We are excited about the updated v1.1 Delegate Incentive Program as well. ### [ArbitrumDAO Off-site](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x21a4ec3fd338fa4eb2230d0e6131d1411639d94cf1b27864c9a3c1c722568c08) (Snapshot) > [@ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Directional proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrumdao-off-site/25660/38): > > We vote FOR this temp-check on Snapshot. We are in favor of exploring an opportunity for delegates to effectively work on important matters in an offline environment during a big conference like DevCon. The details and execution plan should be definitely sorted out, though. ### [An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x04971448620419df86ea930d3f4ae75ad4fff2ebcaead84687a27475f00e24d5) (Snapshot) > [@Team #6: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/37): > > We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot because of the process issue. The governance process should be clearly defined in the governance document and widely known especially to proposal creators (delegate with enough VPs to create proposals) who should be guardians of enforcing the guidance defined in the governance document. ### [Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/22562217031893796518849144396978331510254494883851105730012486117405397295942) (Onchain) > [@Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-arbitrum-dao/25246/82): > > We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain [the rationale](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-arbitrum-dao/25246/58) made for its Snapshot voting and continue to support the proposal as it is. [Next page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585.md?page=2)