# Tané Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2024, 8:12pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/25 "2024-09-12T20:12:28Z")

</div>

### [Fund the Stylus Sprint](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xbe03044e4eeddfe838b719cffe234aced53238da1cef7f3e5e8c2a86aadcccb6) (Snapshot)

> [@\[RFC\] Fund The Stylus Sprint](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-fund-the-stylus-sprint/26437/28):
>
> We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe Stylus is an ambitious, yet reasonable innovation that Offchain Labs has developed to make Arbitrum even more attractive to Rust and C++ developers and it’s important to generate momentum of its use within the developer community to have attractive applications and toolings on the Arbitrum ecosystem, thus the program like this is timely, crucial and much needed. We also agree that having an Evaluation Committee is selected by the program manager…

### [Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x22f9e560d0a4aac46cc1e49ea71858d531226d0750409acdbfd766fa9c5eb1cb) (Snapshot)

> [@Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096/33):
>
> We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We maintain the support made in the comment before and appreciate RARI Foundation’s plan to offset the cost of bridging and implement potential incentives for its smoother transition.

### [ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee Phase II](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x66812a5c91fe5f590965148c76f1ca609fdc5ded722544673c275a3b2ed94549) (Snapshot)

> [@Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/53):
>
> We vote Yes - Extend for the proposal on Snapshot. We appreciate all the work and comprehensive report provided for the Phase I and continuous effort to be made by the experienced actors in the area. However, we echo the concerns by other delegates on bigger scopes and higher compensations to each party (2.5x from the one in Phase I). Also, the detailed breakdown of the budget, especially the below part should be explicitly clarified in the proposal. On the election, it makes sense to keep th…

### [[Pyth Network] Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb761aeef86e9c7a12a7c7326f28cb10bd0d9d94a83041624dc5d03628c3f5c94) (Snapshot)

> [@\[RFC\] Pyth Network Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-pyth-network-arbitrum-ltipp-extension-request/26533/42):
>
> We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While the request itself seems totally valid and we expressed the support, we have resolved to respect the decision made with the Incentives Detox period (which hasn’t started yet but in effect soon) and we believe all the extension requests should be treated the same. We apologize for the wrong signal made before realizing the Detox is in effect for the extension.

### [Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x9db0ec7f1e6dbdaaa472eaabad7c69fac93d4453e01ce04f1971a4cbd3655ba4) (Snapshot)

> [@\[RFC\] Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-synthetix-ltip-grant-extension-request/26524/36):
>
> We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While the request itself seems totally valid, we respect the decision made with the Incentives Detox period (which hasn’t started yet but in effect soon) and we believe all the extension requests should be treated the same.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585)._