# Tané Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2024, 4:47pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/26 "2024-09-20T16:47:48Z")

</div>

### [[Aave DAO] LTIPP Grant Extension Request](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x785e8ed145d34ab4c9fea725cf0ce31267f90bc2ed4423e6e718c5e736e84c06) (Snapshot)

> [@RFC: Aave DAO LTIPP Grant Extension Request](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-aave-dao-ltipp-grant-extension-request/26612/32):
>
> We vote AGAINST the proposal on Snapshot. While the request itself seems totally valid, we respect the decision made with the Incentives Detox period and we believe all the extension requests should be treated the same.

### [Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xffe9bb38228fdaf3d121140856fd2d51c2ca7f8e0d1021c07e791cebb541129a) (Snapshot)

> [@Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/71):
>
> We support this proposal and vote for “Collect bids in ETH to treasury” on Snapshot. We maintain our stance in [the comment](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/24) posted before and continue to support the progress of the development of Timeboost. We have also support the adjustments around a few parameters to be adjustable by Offchain Labs to fine-tune the design and achieve the stability, user experience and economics for the Arbitrum DAO. Also, interested in the future improvement partnering with the Espresso team. One question f…

### [Terms of Tenure for STEP program manager](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd05fe5e629072098183d454fb5084715a19d5b3285af2b87c3dad7b61d614954) (Snapshot)

> [@\*\*Non-Constitutional: Terms of Tenure for STEP Program Manager\*\*](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-terms-of-tenure-for-step-program-manager/26675/35):
>
> We vote for additional funds for one year as the first choice on Snapshot. While the DAO needs to address the issue around the conversation between the fiat and ARB token, we agree that the initial promise and contract with service providers should be respected and followed through with funds compensated by the treasury. Now, it’s more critical to execute the program than delaying the operations.

### [ArbitrumDAO Off-site](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x8f242363dbc69d640799b461b27ba7b957ab13af87389b699639ba335b8b5e91) (Snapshot)

> [@Arbitrum Offsite format: online vs IRL](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-offsite-format-online-vs-irl/26629/48):
>
> We vote for the proposal as followed on Snapshot. We believe the GovHack will cover what this program has to provide in part and the only possible format to differentiate from the other offline event form is online events, but they have to be clearly designed, focused, promoted and executed with a much lower budget, which is challenging.

### [GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x41bc78325225705741c2eaebd9352bde74c2b28867e1a7321ccab0fa8fd5c2b7) (Snapshot)

> [@GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/govhack-devcon-in-bangkok-hack-humanity/26634/34):
>
> We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. Thanks @KlausBrave for the update. As discussed separately, this is a great update at this moment, and you can prepare for the 2025 event planning with other initiatives ahead into 2025. Looking forward to the GovHack Devcon!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585)._