# Tané Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2024, 8:24pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/36 "2024-12-05T20:24:00Z")

</div>

### [Designing and operating the reporting and information function](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x6f6ad0d74853f8d37a53bbb49c9747072b5e21d885391f5d2d4c41663dca516c) (Snapshot)

Summary: This proposal seeks to establish a Reporting and Information function within the Arbitrum DAO to enhance transparency, accountability, and performance tracking of initiatives, addressing current inconsistencies in reporting processes and improving overall organizational efficiency.

Voting and rationale:

> [@Designing and Operating the Reporting and Information Function](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609/50):
>
> We vote AGAINST the proposal. We acknowledge that this version of the proposal will be updated with another proposal in the near future.

### [[Non-consitutional] User Research: Why build on Arbitrum?](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x107fc8aecc6054725266830cd9097b7ff71f632c708c5ca39e58c5be88f46f14) (Snapshot)

Summary: The proposal seeks to conduct comprehensive user research to understand why builders and entrepreneurs choose to develop on Arbitrum, identify its strengths and weaknesses compared to competitors, and provide actionable insights to guide future development and strategic decisions within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Voting and rationale:

> [@\[Non-consitutional\] User Research: Why do people even build on Arbitrum, anyway?](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-consitutional-user-research-why-do-people-even-build-on-arbitrum-anyway/27608/79):
>
> We vote for Arbitrum and two others. We support the general direction of the initiative; it’s vital to understand what customers think about the product and ecosystem via user research. While the ARDC could cover this in an ideal world, we think it’s acceptable for another initiative like this to cover the important initiative. Eventually, the DAO should have its continuous system to work on efforts around this user research area. Without compared ecosystems to research against, the research o…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585)._
