# Tané Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [May 2, 2024, 2:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585 "2024-05-02T02:35:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 50
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [June 19, 2025, 5:58am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585/50 "2025-06-19T05:58:57Z")
### [Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x65b2b835f03bc18aa401b88702145e6b7686e8d7ddddfd956837251f8a7a7da1) (Snapshot) > [@Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388/42): > > We vote against this proposal. The proposal pinpoints a real bottleneck. Delegates have watched promising ideas wither while each step—draft, OAT review, Snapshot, on-chain execution—grinds forward, so letting OpCo co-design solutions with service providers before a formal DAO vote could shrink timelines, surface realistic budgets sooner, and keep momentum alive. We share that goal, and we agree that some discretionary spend is essential to avoid bureaucratic gridlock. Where we part ways is o… ### [Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x38663c36b26252acff6c6ca43663167858f51f960235dc0441bd2ad4a8f66fb1) (Snapshot) > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-let-s-improve-our-governance-forum-with-three-proposals-app-feature-integrations/29398/77): > > We vote against this proposal. We acknowledge the efforts made to adjust the proposal from a $200k two-year commitment down to $60k for one year, which indeed appears more reasonable. However, our fundamental concern remains unchanged regarding whether the proposed features (voting power tags, live votes, email notifications) genuinely deliver sufficient value relative to the cost. To reiterate clearly, we don’t dispute the appropriateness of the proposed costs in terms of hosting and technical… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tane-delegate-communication-thread/23585)._