# Ultra Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 25, 2024, 1:40am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425 "2024-05-25T01:40:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 118

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2025, 5:06am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425/118 "2025-03-27T05:06:02Z")

</div>

# [GMC’s Preferred Allocations (7,500 ETH)](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xf9fd09839ad10b0bb16c97a1cc4618270ed4145a38561da35ac4afe84516a107)

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: Abstain

Rationale:

> [@GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/69):
>
> I’ve decided to abstain. Initially, I was highly critical of the proposal due to its exclusive focus on non-native protocols. I was happy to see the addition of Camelot to the allocation list, which is a positive step. However, while the inclusion of Camelot addresses some of my initial concerns about prioritizing non-native protocols, I believe the allocation remains imbalanced and does not fully reflect the DAO’s potential to empower local builders. I appreciate the effort to improve the prop…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425)._
