# Ultra Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 25, 2024, 1:40am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425 "2024-05-25T01:40:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 79

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2024, 4:40am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425/79 "2024-10-23T04:40:48Z")

</div>

# [[Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xe41fa9b0999dbd9276f7e4474e575883717020128b80dc6bd27b75ba5bd6420c)

Platform: Snapshot

Vote: Against

Rationale:

> [@\[Non-Constitutional\] Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-token-swap-pilot-program/27106/57):
>
> I’m voting against. After following the discussions and evaluating all the elements, I think that this proposal has too many risks or aspects that don’t match with the goals of the DAO. The short-term lock-in period might make it difficult to set long-term success. I’m also voting against because of the uncertain feasibility of an actual diversification of the treasury, which was set as one of the goals of the proposal. I find this Token Swap Pilot Program interesting, but not in these terms. B…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ultra-delegate-communication-thread/24425)._
