I’ve been following the updates to the Code of Conduct and I’m generally on board with this direction, moving it to a living document just makes things way more practical and avoids bogging things down in overhead, and the optimistic approval approach through OpCo feels a solid way to handle small changes.
On the shielded voting, I’m actually a fan of it since it usually does a better job of capturing the “wisdom of the crowd” even when people are talking about their votes, but I’m glad it’s becoming an optional tool for the proposal manager to use as they see fit. My only small bit of feedback is that we should be careful with the “brief rationale” requirement; let’s not turn that into a new meta-debate. The manager should just make the call based on the program’s needs so we can roll with it.
EDIT: Voting for on Snapshot.