# Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [June 3, 2025, 2:31pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388 "2025-06-03T14:31:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 39

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gi0rgos](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/gi0rgos/32/14531_2.png) [@gi0rgos](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/gi0rgos)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2025, 5:00pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388/39 "2025-06-18T17:00:10Z")

</div>

It’s possible that if this proposal had come while the OpCo was already fully operational, I might have taken a different stance. However, given the strong majority by which the OpCo passed, and considering its expected usefulness in supporting the DAO going forward, I will vote **For**.

If I’ve correctly understood the context from all the related proposals I’ve engaged with, and if I’ve correctly interpreted the tone during the most recent calls, then I sense that the overall direction is to support the OpCo. Choosing otherwise here might reflect inconsistency with previous votes.

Lastly, I’d like to note that during the corresponding community call, @Frisson gave a very thorough overview of the proposal, and no participant raised any objections.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388)._
