# Zeptimus Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Created:** [February 1, 2025, 5:08pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328 "2025-02-01T17:08:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 24
**Author:** ![Zeptimus](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/zeptimus/32/5471_2.png) [@Zeptimus](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Zeptimus)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2025, 10:52am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328/24 "2025-06-27T10:52:48Z")
# **Delegate Update: May** > [@\[RFC\] Proposal to Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratifying the Agentic Governance Pivot](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-proposal-to-adjust-the-voting-power-of-the-arbitrum-community-pool-ratifying-the-agentic-governance-pivot/29280/40): > > I’m voting B: Acknowledge the pivot and reduce delegation to 100,000 ARB. The original Event Horizon proposal was to empower community members lacking capital to participate in governance. This pivot to AI agents completely abandons that mission without DAO approval. As someone who values clear accountability mechanisms, this unauthorized pivot is problematic. We delegated 7M ARB for voter enfranchisement, not AI experimentation. That being said, I appreciate Event Horizon’s continued engagem… > [@Wind Down the MSS + Transfer Payment Responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/wind-down-the-mss-transfer-payment-responsibilities-to-the-arbitrum-foundation/29279/30): > > Vote: FOR This one’s pretty clear tbh. ARB tanked and now MSS is running out of money, but here’s the thing, the Foundation already has to approve every single transaction anyway because of compliance stuff. So we’re basically paying 12 people to click approve on things that are already pre-approved. The Arbitrum Foundation is already handling the heavy lifting on legal and compliance, so it makes sense to let them take care of things for now until OpCo, which we agreed will take over, is read… > [@Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388/9): > > These structural changes are creating some accountability gaps while giving OpCo way more authority. I get that operational flexibility is needed, but not by throwing basic governance safeguards out the window. Letting OAT members keep their service provider relationships while they’re approving discretionary spending? That’s a direct financial conflict waiting to happen. An OAT member could literally approve contracts that benefit their own company, and we’re supposed to trust that “recusal” w… > [@DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/defi-renaissance-incentive-program-drip/29049/105): > > Voting AGAINST in Tally. I appreciate the clawback mechanism with the snapshot vote and Entropy taking responsibility for failures/successes. Entropy has been working for a while and deserves the trust. Even with these improvements, I’m voting against because of the substantial amount of money for this experiment without real skin in the game. I truly believe what I said before. I saw this firsthand on Honeyswap community where HONEY token lost value and momentum from mercenary capital. That’s… > [@Reallocate Redeemed USDM Funds to STEP 2 Budget](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/reallocate-redeemed-usdm-funds-to-step-2-budget/29335/21): > > Voting FOR. I wish we didn’t have to vote on these kinds of things. These are very clear decisions that we should just move forward with. This is basic treasury management, not something that needs DAO governance overhead. > [@\[DIP v1.6\] Delegate Incentive Program Results (May 2025)](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-6-delegate-incentive-program-results-may-2025/29459/9): > > Title: Dispute Delegate Name: Zeptimus Reason for Dispute (please detail): I am submitting this dispute regarding the DIP V1.6 results as I believe there are inaccuracies in the scoring and assessment of my participation. Call Attendance (5 June) I attended all three, including the one on 5 June. I believe the system may have failed to properly record my participation in one of them. I recall specifically one instance where I joined while multitasking, and that somehow generated an audio bug… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328)._