# Zeptimus Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Created:** [February 1, 2025, 5:08pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328 "2025-02-01T17:08:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 27
**Author:** ![Zeptimus](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/zeptimus/32/5471_2.png) [@Zeptimus](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Zeptimus)\ **Post date:** [April 24, 2026, 11:45am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328/27 "2026-04-24T11:45:45Z")
# March & April > [@Automate the Consolidation of Idle Funds into the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/automate-the-consolidation-of-idle-funds-into-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30579/8): > > I’ll be voting to abstain. I fully support the intent, but the vote feels rushed and we should explore better coordination. If DAO Grants is having an S4, I don’t see the need to pull funds from an active initiative including S2. I’m abstaining rather than voting against because I do see value in moving quickly given the current market conditions. > [@\[Constitutional\] DVP Quorum for ArbitrumDAO: Implementation & Parameters](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao-implementation-parameters/30484/51): > > Still voting FOR. My stance hasn’t changed, DVP makes sense, and the addition of proposal cancellation is a great quality of life update. > [@Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO Procedures to Become Living Documents](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-code-of-conduct-dao-procedures-to-become-living-documents/30664/2): > > I’ve been following the updates to the Code of Conduct and I’m generally on board with this direction, moving it to a living document just makes things way more practical and avoids bogging things down in overhead, and the optimistic approval approach through OpCo feels a solid way to handle small changes. On the shielded voting, I’m actually a fan of it since it usually does a better job of capturing the “wisdom of the crowd” even when people are talking about their votes, but I’m glad it’s be… > [@March 2026 Security Council Election: Nominee Selection](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-nominee-selection/30682/3): > > These security elections are getting more competitive every time, which only helps Arbitrum. It’s honestly expensive, but no one wants to be cheap on security, it’s arguably the most important thing, and getting these folks to be ready 24/7 is a massive commitment. I’m confident almost everyone from the list would fit as a good security council member. I ended up voting for: Yoav: I support his focus on long-term sustainability and deep L2 experience makes him a perfect anchor for the counci… > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: ArbOS 60 Elara](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-arbos-60-elara/30601/4): > > Fully support this upgrade. I’ve heard of builders getting excited about the Stylus contract size increasing to 96KB, it’s going to unlock a lot of potential and we also had a discusiion on the fees before my stance stay the same. Plus, Offchain Labs is absolutely the best team to execute something this complex. > [@Transfer 6,000 ETH and Idle Stablecoins from the Treasury to the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/transfer-6-000-eth-and-idle-stablecoins-from-the-treasury-to-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30691/8): > > Voting FOR. The ATMC has already shown a good performance, so moving this capital into active strategies makes sense. > [@Improvements to the Arbitrum Audit Program](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/improvements-to-the-arbitrum-audit-program/30697/4): > > Voting FOR. I really like the AI security scan pilot, it’ll give early teams a clear direction and the confidence to keep building. If lowering the barriers is what Arbitrum needs to bring in more quality long-term, I’m all for it. > [@RAD Update #3 - March 2026](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rad-update-3-march-2026/30736/3): > > I’m generally in favor of these changes. I would also recommend encouraging comments at the earlier stages of a proposal, as that’s when they are most valuable. Pushing comments at the Tally stage just for rewards feels like overkill if you’ve already shared your stance, unless the proposal has actually changed. To keep it simple, I would do 1 comment per proposal, and see if it also helps delegates to share their stance this way 1 comment is 10% 2 times and removing the fricction of writing a c… > [@March 2026 Security Council Election: Nominee Selection](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/march-2026-security-council-election-nominee-selection/30682/8): > > All 5 made it to the next face, I casted my vote supporting them again. Good luck! > [@Transfer 6,000 ETH and Idle Stablecoins from the Treasury to the Treasury Management Portfolio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/transfer-6-000-eth-and-idle-stablecoins-from-the-treasury-to-the-treasury-management-portfolio/30691/23): > > I’ll be voting FOR on Tally. With the recent wave of hacks, the security landscape is definitely getting more stressful, but based on their track record, I’m confident the right strategies are in place to keep our capital protected. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/zeptimus-delegate-communication-thread/28328)._