+1 here
All for efficiency, all for having people with the authority and ability to execute. Not keen on forcing everything to be approved by a small group of centralised entities, thus adding further hurdles to anyone who wants to propose via the DAO.
What I’d like to see is the foundation and OCL proposing SOSs, driving proposals through the DAO, etc. Instead of eliminating the ability of anyone else to propose unless they have their blessing.
If the current AAEs were more transparent and open, we could enable so much outside-in innovation. We can out-collaborate the competition, instead of defaulting to an old-fashioned model of work that quickly becomes full of bottlenecks. (I say this after a decade-plus in organisation design. I have no love for hippie models that can’t execute, but I also have no love for slow and clunky bureocracies that suck the soul out of workers and get people more interested in Instagram than doing their job).
More on this here https://x.com/_Daniel_Ospina/status/1924907740675141642
And taking a pragmatic approach to align things with the SOSs and the positive aspects of the vision: [SOS Submission] {Merged: TBD} – Strategic Objectives - #14 by danielo