The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in Tally voting.
As mentioned in our Snapshot rationale, we support programs that lower barriers for early-stage teams to build confidently on Arbitrum. Audit costs often block promising projects from launching safely, and this initiative directly addresses that issue.
Since the Snapshot vote, we’ve seen meaningful improvements in the proposal. One concern we had earlier was around eligibility criteria - specifically, how the committee would define which projects can apply. That’s now clearly addressed in the updated version, which helps set expectations and filters out applications that don’t meet the intended purpose of the program.
We also appreciate the added clarity around transparency reporting. Having quarterly updates is good to keep the DAO informed.
Overall, the proposal has shaped up well, and we’re aligned with the direction it’s taking.