Arbitrum Audit Program

I am voting in favor of this proposal. It is the type of proposal that allows for the growth of the ecosystem, and we need it. The only thing I would suggest (besides maybe waiting another week, as looking at the comments might make it seem rushed, but now is on snapshot so doesn’t matter) is a commitment to more clarity in the selection process before moving to Tally. In the last ADPC, for example, we had excellent documentation, but there was no mention of the projects that applied and were rejected, or the reasons behind it. I understand this could stem from data and privacy concerns, but overall, I believe the benefits of disclosing the full selection process outweigh keeping it gated.