voting For on the current offchain vote because the monetary ask is not that big for the return this can have, the DAO needs regular events like this to attract good and honest founders into Arbitrum, the Farstar team is competent and has done this before at the highest level, and the timeline proposed seems doable. Also, I believe the Events Budget 2025 is exactly the avenue that should fund this type of proposal, and as a reminder for my fellow distinguished delegates that are worried about spending the Events Budget 2025, I would like to remind them that that budget and committee was funded through onchain vote more than 3 months ago, with $1.5M USD in total to be spend, and at the moment it has only spent $55,800 USD for ETH Bucharest 2025. Which means that, excluding the $400K USD that were already reserved for the Arbitrum Foundation this year and that are going to be used fully for ETH Denver in the next couple weeks, the DAO has only spent ~5% of this annual events budget, in the last 3 months ($1.5M in total - $400K for the AF = $1.1M remaining and therefore the $55.8K allocated to ETH Bucharest is 5.05% of 1.1M). And I’m not arguing that we should be voting For in every proposal that comes to the DAO trying to get funded through that budget, but I believe we should be more worried about the fact that almost no service provider comes forward and tries to propose an event or series of events that use that budget. That was the original intention of the 2025 Events Budget, and at this rate, is not being fulfilled at all.