We’re voting FOR this proposal
Rationale
- Fills a Governance Gap: The proposal addresses the DAO’s lack of clear, unified objectives, improving resource allocation and accountability.
- Structured, Transparent Process: A phased approach and OKR framework ensure inclusivity and clarity in defining objectives.
- Proactive Strategy: Moves the DAO towards proactive, strategic governance aligned with its long-term mission and vision.
- Flexibility and Accountability: Annual reviews and ad hoc adjustments allow adaptability, while clear objectives and key results enhance progress measurement.
- Encourages Participation: A transparent submission, feedback, and revision process fosters inclusivity and collaboration.
Points Worth Considering
- Timeline Duration: The three-month process may be too long for a fast-moving market; consider streamlining.
- Support for Contributors: Provide tools or templates to help less experienced contributors craft proposals.
- Centralization Risks: Distribute responsibility to mitigate over-reliance on Entropy Advisors.
- Clarity on Execution and Budget: Additional details on implementation and resource allocation are needed.
- Review Frequency: Evaluate if semi-annual reviews are necessary for agility without causing instability.