I’m abstaining on this proposal.
As stated above, I do see value in an overall process that puts liquid funds at use right away, especially in a market such the one we have. At the same time, I don’t think that this justify adding overhead to any specific plan from delegates or other entities; specifically, as mentioned, there is an ongoing discussion about continuation of the grant program using funds from both S2 and S3. Having had that resolved before calling on this vote would have been ideal, to avoid double transfer if any.
This proposal will pass, and is fine. If the grant program will be renewed, in the new vote it will be specified how the portion of funds of S2 will have to be sent back to it from the ATMC, alongside S3 funds being rolled.