JoJo
February 27, 2026, 11:47am
23
March 2026 voting Snapshot votings Vote: Abstain
Thanks for the proposal. It does makes a lot of sense, in general, to allocate idle stables into yield bearing strategies, with the caveat of risk profile and liquidity being compatible and of secondary order to the operational needs of the programs involved.
I am just chiming in with a note which was already disclosed in private to Entropy: while, as stated, I agree on the general idea, we are currently discussing with OpCo first, and likely DAO later, about either a potential extention of season 3 or renewal. S3 and S2 funds would be part of this.
Albeit it might not happen, moving the funds before this discussion is over would be not ideal; that said, while is difficult to do hard projections, I do think that any decision, in favour of against, will likely happen before or around the second half of April on this very topic.
I’m abstaining on this proposal.
As stated above, I do see value in an overall process that puts liquid funds at use right away, especially in a market such the one we have. At the same time, I don’t think that this justify adding overhead to any specific plan from delegates or other entities; specifically, as mentioned, there is an ongoing discussion about continuation of the grant program using funds from both S2 and S3. Having had that resolved before calling on this vote would have been ideal, to avoid double transfer if any.
This proposal will pass, and is fine. If the grant program will be renewed, in the new vote it will be specified how the portion of funds of S2 will have to be sent back to it from the ATMC, alongside S3 funds being rolled.
Tally votings Vote: For
Confirming the snapshot vote. The changes in the constitution seems consistent with the proposal.
Vote: Tino (1M), Michael Lewellen (1M), Bartek (500k)
I have split my vote between the 3 candidates I would like to see in the next phase.