Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal

Proposals Finalized AIPs
16

Thank you for your effort @aminiman, here is some thoughts form me.

Positive Aspects

I believe the proposal has several strong points:

  1. Comprehensive Developer Support: I think the proposal offers a holistic approach to supporting developers, including community building, market research, ideation support, venture building, pre-accelerator, and accelerator programs.
  2. Strategic Alignment: It seems to align well with Arbitrum’s strategic priorities, such as robust DevRel, governance optimization, future-proofing, and community growth.
  3. Experienced Partners: Partnering with reputable entities like Outlier Ventures, RnDAO, and EVM Capital adds credibility and increases the likelihood of successful implementation.
  4. Clear Metrics and Accountability: The proposal outlines clear expected outcomes and key performance indicators (KPIs), such as the number of applications, startups, and deployments. Additionally, it includes transparent reporting and accountability mechanisms.
  5. Diverse Program Offerings: The variety of programs, including Entrepreneur in Residence, Venture Builder, and Base Camp, provides tailored support for different stages of development.

Constructive Criticisms

However, I feel there are areas for improvement:

  1. High Cost: The total cost of $10 million is substantial. While the proposal details the use of funds, the high cost may raise concerns about the return on investment.
  2. Risk of Over-Saturation: Running multiple programs simultaneously could lead to resource dilution and overlap. Clear distinction and coordination between the different programs are necessary.
  3. Need for More Specific Impact Metrics: Although the proposal includes general KPIs, I believe more specific impact metrics, such as ecosystem growth, user engagement, and long-term sustainability, would make the proposal more compelling.
  4. Implementation Timeline: The timeline spans from Q3-2024 to Q4-2025, which is relatively long. Interim milestones and regular evaluations would help assess progress and make necessary adjustments.
  5. Dependence on Market Conditions: The success of the program partly depends on favorable market conditions. Including contingency plans for adverse market scenarios would strengthen the proposal.

Voting Decision: Abstain

While I believe the “Infinite Launchpad” proposal has many promising elements and aligns well with strategic goals, the high cost, potential resource overlap, and need for more specific impact metrics make me cautious at this stage. I support the concept and see its potential, but I recommend further detailed planning and clear differentiation of program phases. Therefore, at this point, I choose to abstain, awaiting further refinements and assurances on these issues.