Clarity around the ratification of AIP-1

I think most of the community understands the need to properly fund a foundation and ensure that it has the resources to operate for the long haul. However the way this was communicated and proposed to the community left much to be desired and I think in the wake of everything the proposal should be altered and put up for re-ratification with the following added conditions:

  1. Implement a 5 year linear vesting schedule for the 750m tokens. This would ensure a steady unlock of funds while guaranteeing that the foundation has the resources to operate at the same time.

  2. For the appointed multi-sig operators in charge of the special grants - their terms of service should be limited to 2 years (with the DAO having the ability to remove them ahead of time via governance proposals). In addition - 3 additional signers should be elected by the DAO at the end of the first year to erect a rolling committee of 6 signers responsible for special grants with 3 members up for election every year. This rolling committee would hopefully encourage the community to be more active in governance (specifically the election of replacement members) and also ensure urgency for elected members to shoot for maximum impact during the duration of their term.

3 Likes