Proposal: AIP-1.1 - Lockup, Budget, Transparency

AIP-1.1 - Lockup, Budget, Transparency




tl;dr: This proposal proposes (1) a lockup, (2) a budget and (3) transparency reporting regarding the 7.5% of the $ARB tokens distributed to the Foundation’s “Administrative Budget Wallet”.

The Administrative Budget Wallet will be used for covering ongoing administrative and operational costs of The Arbitrum Foundation, payment of service providers, and for the purpose of fostering the growth and development of the Arbitrum ecosystem. In respect to the 7.5% that has been distributed to the Administrative Budget Wallet, a transparency report regarding the 0.5% that has already been transferred is available here.

The remaining 7% of tokens will not be used until the approval of a budget, such as the one proposed in this AIP. The proposed budget is in-line with the Foundation’s strategic needs to represent and service the DAO and the allocation is smaller than initial allocations to peer foundations. This AIP proposes placing the 7% outstanding distribution in a smart contract-controlled lockup – linearly unlocking over 4 years – alongside transparency report structures to allow the DAO to periodically monitor expenditures and other activities of the Foundation.

The Administrative Budget Wallet will be used in pursuit of the Foundation’s mission statement as set out in the bylaws, which includes financing technical improvements and operations of the Arbitrum network, fostering ecosystem growth through grants to align with partner projects and educational initiatives with in-person and online events.


On March 16, 2023, the Arbitrum networks (Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova) were decentralized and given to the newly formed Arbitrum DAO. Included in this transition were:

  • Control of the upgradeability and technical future of the chains
  • Control over the DAO treasury
  • Control over net fee revenue - i.e. the net difference between fees collected by on-chain operations and L1 fees paid by the Sequencer
  • All Arbitrum social media platforms and accounts
  • Ability to elect and, if deemed appropriate, remove the Security Council and Directors

Full responsibility of the chain’s technology, future, and fee revenue were given to the DAO directly. With the DAO assuming those rights and controls, the DAO also assumed the responsibility to fund the ongoing operations of the chains and the costs of running critical chain infrastructure, including RPCs, the Sequencer, and third-party vendors and service contracts.

While there are many activities that the DAO can do directly on-chain, several of its responsibilities require a representative that can engage, maintain and enter new agreements with service providers to run infrastructure that’s critical for the ecosystem (e.g. servers, RPCs, block explorers, data feeds and analytics platforms, and tooling), and ensure that both the chain and the ecosystem have the support they need to continue to thrive. In order to ensure a smooth transition to the DAO without any interruption of services, it was necessary to create an organization that would be ready to service the DAO immediately from launch.

The Arbitrum Foundation was created to fill this need, with its mission and scope outlined across the Foundation Bylaws. Prior to the launching of the DAO, The Arbitrum Foundation assumed responsibilities for funding and running chain infrastructure. However, in an arrangement that appears to be unique amongst Arbitrum’s peers, the Foundation does not receive or control the net revenue from transaction fees as this is given directly to the DAO treasury.

The DAO is also tasked with fostering and developing the Arbitrum ecosystem, where the DAO may seek to partner with companies or organizations that either cannot or will not publicly negotiate collaborations or partnerships due to confidentiality and other operational requirements. Often, large enterprises negotiate partnership opportunities in private without public processes, where these relationships can only be disclosed after they are agreed upon. Having a well-funded Foundation empowered to represent the DAO in this arena, alongside peer foundations, is in the best interests of the DAO to further develop the growth of the Arbitrum ecosystem.


While the need for the Foundation to exist and represent the DAO is well-motivated, it became clear through community discourse around AIP-1 that it was important to have additional insight and restrictions on the Foundation’s initial funding. This AIP-1.1 proposes a detailed set of controls and initiatives to achieve that goal.

1. Smart Contract Lockup

The remaining 7% of ARB tokens in the “Administrative Budget Wallet” will be subject to a four year lockup schedule, unlocking on a continuous linear time basis commencing from the date of the Snapshot approval of AIP-1.1 by the DAO (i.e., a total of 175m $ARB released over each year for 4 years). The lockup will be enforced on-chain through a smart contract which will designate a multisig wallet controlled by The Arbitrum Foundation as the beneficiary. The lockup contract will be configured in a manner that allows the DAO to adjust future funding and/or modify the unlock schedule.

2. Operating Budget

Below is a proposed annual operational budget for the first year of the Foundation. While the operational costs are denominated in USD, the expectation is that approximately half will be paid in USD and half will be paid in locked $ARB tokens.

As this will be the first year of the Foundation’s operation and as the Foundation is still young at the time of this AIP, it goes without saying that these are estimates with the expectation that this will be an upper bound on the operational costs for the first 12 months. The transparency reports described in the next section will be an opportunity to track the actual expenses against the budgeted categories and keep the community informed.

Operating Budget
Cost ($USD)
General and Administrative $16,000,000
R&D $9,000,000
Technical Infrastructure $5,000,000
Events, Marketing & Communications $6,000,000
Total - Next Twelve Months $36,000,000
(50% $USD/50% $ARB)

*The General and Administrative line-item includes personnel, contractors, legal, insurance and other operational costs. As of the date of this AIP, the Foundation currently has five full-time contributors, 8 contractors, and the Security Council engaged to support the Arbitrum ecosystem. The Foundation’s budget anticipates the need to hire an additional 15 full-time contributors across technical, growth and community functions over the course of this year.

This operating budget presents best-faith estimates of the Foundation’s anticipated budgetary needs which may be subject to change.

3. Ecosystem Growth Initiatives

Any additional funds released in compliance with the lock-up schedule above will be made available, but not necessarily deployed, to opportunistically pursue ecosystem growth opportunities and strategic partnerships on behalf of the DAO. The expectation is that the vast majority of ecosystem growth funds will be paid in tokens, and thus will not require the Foundation to sell any tokens. Wherever reasonable, the Foundation will include additional lockups and/or vesting when making distributions in tokens.

The Mission Statement in the Foundation’s bylaws highlights the varied nature of the opportunities the Foundation intends to pursue, and a set of KPIs that can track all of these opportunities being developed. The basis of those KPIs will stem from a focus on onboarding and growing both the developer and user base of the Arbitrum ecosystem, attracting best-in-class infrastructure providers to the network, expanding across various industries, use-cases and scope of projects that engage with Arbitrum technology. The ultimate goal of the Foundation is to continue to foster the development of the technology and expand the Arbitrum ecosystem globally.

In addition to the Foundation’s processes for selecting grants, it is important to note that the DAO maintains control over the 3.527 billion $ARB and has the ability to distribute any additional grants as it sees fit. Additionally, should the DAO choose, it has the ability to trigger the inflation of the total supply of $ARB which will supplement the on-chain DAO treasury with 2% growth of the total supply of $ARB each year.

4. Transparency Reports

The Foundation understands and agrees that the community should have oversight across how these funds are being utilized to gain comfort that spending is in the interest of the community. In furtherance of this goal, the Foundation is committed to providing a comprehensive annual report and a semi-annual progress update. This will provide the community with a better understanding of the Foundation’s expenditures, balance sheet and its pursuit of ecosystem growth opportunities alongside partnership developments, as well as the various internal and external committees and stakeholders that are involved in the decision making process.

The Foundation is continuing to build out its internal personnel to service grant requests and has already engaged a DAO service provider to assist with the administrative components of servicing grants. The Foundation is also talking with a number of different external service providers to assist in both the review and diligence processes.

The financial element of these transparency reports will include a breakdown of operational costs incurred while running the Foundation, including infrastructure spending for the Arbitrum chains, events, community building efforts, grants, etc.

In addition to the aforementioned reports, the Foundation is providing an initial transparency report alongside this AIP covering all major actions and decisions the Foundation made during set-up, including the costs incurred up until now, which can be found here.

Steps to Implement

  1. Foundation to deploy smart contract vesting wallet in the specified configuration and transfer 700 million $ARB to it.
  2. Foundation to implement all processes described in this AIP.


This AIP-1.1 shall be posted on the DAO forum and will have at least a 72-hour period for DAO comments and input. After the end of the 72-hour period and appropriate updates incorporating DAO feedback, this AIP-1.1 will be posted for vote on Snapshot for an additional 7 days.


So a contractor receives roughly 400k yearly comp? Sounds like a lot


Not only is 7.5% much less than peers (Optimism 25%), but this transparency report is beyond what I have seen at any DAO using this type of structure.

Overall, this plus the other two documents are a great step forward. I plan to vote in favor of the updates and amendments.

Thank you for addressing the community concerns.


this is good work!I am waiting for snapshot


You lied and stole 750 million tokens and did spend 50 million, no you want to keep the rest you did steal just get it from a smart contract. Pay it back to the foundation and wait for the votes, you are still trying to keep the stolen coins. The trust for this project is hurt to the core, why should we trust your lies this time.


Appreciate the perspective! A lot of work went into addressing all of the community feedback! :blue_heart: :orange_heart:


from 16M 720k will b for security council member (consists of 12 members , each getting paid 5k per month)

remains 15.28 million which will be distributed to remaining 5 contributors and 8 contractors … also they are looking to hire total 15 contributor in a year… so even if we look at those numbers …and take 30 members for ex :
it will 500k+ per person and 400k


Mate you can’t just divide the entire General and Admin budget by headcount, it includes way more than just salaries - they even say it includes insurance, legal and other operating costs right in the post.

By your logic, every employee at Wendys must be making like $200k


Fair point. It would be nice to have some granularity once a quarter regarding these broad buckets they’ve used. When the expenses start rolling in, it would be great to drill down further to ensure that there is no fraudulent or reckless spending.


Happy with the rework. Quoting Joe’s post for emphasis, as it reflects my thoughts. Good job!


I am largely in favor of this proposal, but have a few points I would like clarification around.

  1. More detailed budget
    The included operating budget is very large without much clarification around where the funds are going. Can we get more clarity around budgets for payroll, operating expenses, grants, etc.? Understanding the use of the proceeds will also help us understand the expected impact we should see from the expense.
  2. Community governed roles
    Currently all of the budget is planned to go towards a centralized team of 20 FTEs. Especially as we consider the impact of this program over the next 4 years, it would be good for the community to be able to vote in new representatives for a change in strategy. This could be done in a manner similar to many of the top DAO grants programs where elected delegates are responsible for sourcing, vetting, and allocating grants. Additionally, service orgs like Gauntlet or Reverie could be contracted for specific operations.
  3. Clarity around sale of ARB to USD
    There is a mention of 50% in USD and 50% in ARB. Can we get clarity around the expected sale timeline for these funds?

Appreciate the rework. Thank you for the clarity.


I agree to these amendments and suggestions. If you think that operating expenses only pay salaries for employees, you are wrong. There are many hidden costs and it accounts for 80% of the total cost. Expand your horizons and give the team a chance to build. You want your investment to increase 10 to 20 times and don’t want the core team to have enough operating costs? haha


Appreciate the rework. Thank you for the clarity.


let see what effects seen on prices


I am confused about the decision to allocate 750M tokens from the DAO to the Foundation without any governance decision made from the DAO.

Medium – 16 Mar 23


There was no mention of any Foundation allocation in the “prospectus” that was distributed before allowing the governance tokens to be traded on exchange and I think this should be viewed as legally binding.

Reneging on the communications set out in the prospectus after investors made financial decisions to purchase the governance token on the open market (by a liquidity provider that the service provider contracted the services of) is undeniably fraudulent.

Going forward with ratifying AIP-1 is a clear overreach by the service provider of the DAO’s power. This is an unacceptable precedent to set as it clearly subordinates the DAO to any future decisions by the service provider.

The allocation of the 750M tokens sent to the foundation should be sent back to the DAO immediately, the agreement with Wintermute should be nullified, and any tokens sold on the open market on behalf of the foundation should be bought back on the open market.

The service providers are subordinate to the decisions of the DAO it until its token vest in a year and can make governing decisions.

There needs to be a clear precedent that the governance token holders have full authority and control over the DAO’s treasury resources and any allocations of said resources.

I am personally open to allocating 7.5% or even more to the foundation, but it must come from the decision of the governance holders, not the service provider.


welcome these steps to create more transparency and accountability over the Foundation’s operations!


How is that even legal!
The space needs to be more transparent with market activities, no wonder the SEC is cracking down on us so much recently!
Im voting NO!


Yes, I was leaving a margin there for whatever. So, you think this is alright ?