Thanks for putting this together. Returning stolen property to its rightful owners is the right move.
+1 to everything Griff and 0xDonPepe raised. Arbitrum-side claimants need to be sized clearly inside the waterfall, the math needs to be public before the on-chain vote, and delegates should be added as Indemnified Parties.
As delegates we need to understand what we’re voting on. Collaboration will bring the best possible outcome for everyone, Arbitrum included. But to vote on this in good faith, we need clarity on how Arbitrum users get affected and what KelpDAO is putting in from their treasury alongside the seized ETH.
As Nicksta pointed, 49 days is a long window for the people on the wrong side of those Aave positions. If the disbursement plan can get finalized in parallel with the temperature check rather than after, we save material time without cutting safety steps.