From a legal and operational risk standpoint, keeping the legacy USDT bridge live introduces unnecessary liability and exposure. The current configuration not only delays user access but risks non-compliant handling of smart contract deposits, especially where refund mechanisms are absent. Disabling the bridge streamlines compliance, protects user funds, and aligns with industry best practices in consumer asset safety and protocol governance. It’s a preventive legal upgrade as much as a technical one. Fully support this move.