Thank you for the question, @curia. We need alignment on the new direction before the exact parameters can be voted on. Coming to the DAO with a fixed set of parameters and asking it to vote might have felt like we were expecting a rubber stamp on the new quorum model - which is not our intention.
A temperature check on the broad DVP-Quorum model has two benefits: first, it gives the DAO more opportunities to discuss the model and potential parameters; and second, it allows the community to validate this research direction, meaning the implementation work can start in parallel. You can find the recommended value range in our research report to further understand the nature of the proposed change. We will incorporate feedback from this temperature check and the following discussion into our final recommendation and vote.