Thank you for the proposal.
It is a very serious issue. Of course, there is a huge need for proposals not to fail because of a lack of votes. This aspect is enhanced a lot by the views of @Griff and @Entropy. I see their points, and up to a level, I do agree with them.
On the other hand, I can understand opposing arguments like these stated by @cp0x. But the thing I align with the most is what @blockful said:
So without wanting to add any noise in the conversation, I end up voting AGAINST. Not because it isn’t important to have successful proposals, but unless having simultaneous ways of protecting the token’s price and the treasury level, the way of deciding the quorum should include factors that would protect the DAO, even though the continuous reduction of the token’s price.