The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Tally voting.
We supported the move to a delegated voting power (DVP) based quorum during the Snapshot vote and we continue to support it. Over time, quorum in the DAO has been tied to the total voteable supply, while actual participation depends on delegated voting power. As supply grows and delegation does not keep pace, this gap becomes more visible and reaching quorum becomes harder even when the same active delegates continue to participate.
Moving quorum to DVP makes the system more aligned with how governance actually functions. It does not change voting power or how votes are counted, but it measures quorum against the tokens that are actively delegated and participating in governance.
In addition, enabling onchain proposal cancellation allows proposers to withdraw proposals during the pending period if issues are discovered or parameters need revision after delegate feedback. In practice, this should help avoid unnecessary votes on proposals that the proposer no longer wishes to move forward. So we support it as well.