The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
As mentioned in our previous comment, we’re supporting this proposal as it improves the current bridging experience without introducing new risks or costs to the DAO.
We also believe this kind of update doesn’t always need to go through a full proposal process. A more efficient path could be explored in the DAO allowing Offchain Labs or the Foundation to handle similar requests for which they are capable for a fixed term, with clear reporting. This would reduce the governance load for the delegates while maintaining transparency.
That said, we support this proposal and believe it’s a practical, win-win step for both Arbitrum and the Sky team.