The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb) and @Euphoria, based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
As mentioned in our earlier feedback, we see this as a routine technical update to allow $BORING to bridge properly to Arbitrum, rather than as an endorsement of the token itself.
While we fully support Superboring’s expansion and recognize the value of Super Tokens for on-chain payments, the need for a full DAO vote on these custom token registrations adds unnecessary overhead and slows down onboarding for growing projects. We align with others who’ve said that technical review and audits should become the main requirements, with only exceptional cases going to governance. We urge the DAO to streamline such processes for the future, and we support this request as a positive, low-risk step for Arbitrum.