Dispute
Ignas
Reason for Dispute:
I would like to appeal the scoring of the following comments, which I believe contributed meaningful value to the discussion and should be reconsidered:
1. Comment on this proposal: DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)
I’m unsure why this comment wasn’t awarded any points.
I raised concerns about the proposed budget and offered specific suggestions for improvement. I also proposed partnering with other projects to co fund initiatives, thereby reducing the financial burden on the DAO.
I believe this added value to the conversation.
2. Comment on this proposal: A Vision for the Future of Arbitrum
While my forum comment was brief, my team extended the discussion by publishing a well researched thread on X to help spread the new Arbitrum vision to a broader audience, including users who may not actively follow the forum: Pink Brains Post.
I believe this type of off platform contribution warrants recognition through bonus points.
3. Comment on the discussion: Vote Buying Services
I don’t believe my comment deserved such a low score. My intent was to shift the discussion toward a more structural and long term solution: redesigning tokenomics to realign incentives for ARB holders and reduce reliance on lobbying mechanisms.
I suggested exploring staking mechanisms or veTokenomics via Curve as potential models, not as a detailed implementation, but as a strategic direction to broaden the conversation.
Thank you for your time.