[DIP v1.6] Delegate Incentive Program Results (April 2025)

Title: dispute

We would like to dispute the non-scoring of two comments and the low scoring of another.

Low scoring of Security Council rationale. As it has only been given a 4/10 both on depth and on clarity and communication, when it provides a thoughtful and clear breakdown on the criteria used to pick our candidates. We strongly believe it should be scored higher.

TMC discussion – This comment was not scored even though it contributes to fowarding the discussion on TMC and threesigma’s proposal and suggests improvements on its process. After seeing your report, we disagree, we do offer suggestions with potential impact on the outcome of the proposals, raising questions is valid when looking to contribute discussions around a subject. Addressing your feedback here, some questions had been raised before in September and February, however given that they didn’t make it into the final process the questions could be raised again.

Vote buying services – This comment is valuable and worth scoring in our opinion. Once again, providing a clear assesment and contributing our stance to the discussion.

Thank you for your consideration.