After careful consideration Treasure’s Arbitrum Representative Council (ARC) would like to share the following feedback on the proposal.
The ARC will vote AGAINST the STIP-Bridge proposal for the Tally vote. The ARC fully agrees with the initiative to continue funding to promote and accelerate the adoption of DeFi on Arbitrum, and thereby also the broader adoption of Arbitrum as a whole. However, we think that the parties involved in this proposal will benefit more from a program that is data-driven and an iteration on previous incentive programs.
With respect to the updates, we do not think that the concerns have been adequately addressed:
- Performance audits for the STIP-Bridge would obviously be a good thing, but the concern expressed by the community was about there not being enough data to support the STIP-Bridge, not the fact that the proposed data-collection on the STIP-Bridge was insufficient.
- Involving the advisors from the LTIPP program is a good improvement to the STIP-Bridge. However, the administering of the PM role to the same individual as the STIP and the LTIPP without a vote seems rushed and anti-democratic.
- There have been no changes to the way proposals are voted for, and the ‘optimistic voting mechanism’ will in our eyes lead to a higher chance of passive acceptance by delegates, while also still effectively having the burden of review on the delegates.
Realizing that the STIP-Bridge vote has a high probability of passing, we wish all relevant parties the best and hope that the program will add measurable value to the Arbitrum ecosystem.