Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum

[AlexLumley]

Voted FOR:
Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum

Alex Lumley (Savvy DAO) Delegate Communication Thread

Voted FOR: Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum Previous Voting Rationale: Alex Lumley (Savvy DAO) Delegate Communication Thread - #17 by AlexLumley Stand by my previous Voting Rationale posted above. I do find it curious that this type of proposal is necessary, wonder if something can be done to reduce the need for this in the future.

Previous Commenting Rationale Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - #48 by AlexLumley

Voting Rationale: Alex Lumley (Savvy DAO) Delegate Communication Thread - #40 by AlexLumley

Stand by my previous commenting rationale posted above.

Also, fully agree with Krzysztof’s point here.

@krst

We also think it would be a good idea to discuss how such configuration changes should be handled in the future. At the moment they require a full constitutional vote, just like ArbOS upgrades. If the direction set by RARI is to be followed by other projects, we would probably need a better way to adjust the configuration that does not require a full governance vote. Perhaps we could use the non-emergency Security Council to do this after the proposal has passed the temperature check, or have a separate mechanism that allows an external body (similar to MSS) to adjust these parameters with some additional safeguards.