Entropy Advisors Monthly Update: April 2026

Treasury Management

During the month of April, the wider DeFi ecosystem experienced another notable hack. Kelp’s rsETH OFT was exploited, enabling the attacker to release rsETH from the mainnet bridge without any tokens being burned on other chains. Neither the TM portfolio nor the wider DAO treasury experienced any losses due to the abovementioned incident. Shortly after the exploit was quickly identified and flagged by Entropy Advisors, ~3.5K wstETH was withdrawn from the Aave Arbitrum instance. We also posted an in-depth update following the incident.

The DeFi United initiative has since been stood up with the goal of restoring the backing of rsETH through ETH contributions. Pertaining to Arbitrum, the security council executed an emergency action to freeze ~30,765 ETH held by the exploiter on Arbitrum One. The Arbitrum DAO is currently in the voting process regarding whether or not to release the frozen ETH into DeFi United. More information is available in this forum post.

The phased withdrawal process from Gauntlet’s USDC Prime Vault on Morpho was finalized during the month. ~$4M was withdrawn from the vault. The TM portfolio was also upsized by ~$56K from unused funds related to the legacy ADPC Subsidy Fund initiative. The deployment into syrupUSDC was initiated in April with the aforementioned funds, together with USDC proceeds from the DAO’s covered calls strategy on ETH as well as incentive token rebalances. The deployment was finalized on May 5th, with the DAO now holding ~$5.8M worth of syrupUSDC.

~$9.2M was received from USTB and bIB01 withdrawals during the month. These proceeds were earmarked for supporting ecosystem growth through a deployment with USDai. ~$1M was deployed during April, and the rest of the earmarked funds on May 5th.

On the ETH deployments front, the DAO received 0.32 stETH as part of Lido’s Rewards-Share Program. The kickback covers the Q1 2026 period.

In late April, the OAT approved a phased wind-down of KPK’s active management services. The decision was driven by efforts to streamline operations and ensure cohesion of deployments across the whole TM portfolio, not the active manager’s net performance. The ATMC would like to extend its sincere appreciation for the productive collaboration, as well as for the services and expertise provided by KPK throughout the engagement.

Finally, Entropy posted a proposal to expand the TM portfolio with 6K ETH and ~$150K stablecoins from the DAO treasury. Voting ended on May 8th and the proposal passed with ~194M votes FOR.

Incentives: DRIP

April continued to be a quiet month for DRIP, as partnership negotiations are still ongoing. Additionally, users have until EoD May 18th, 2026, to claim rewards from all participating protocols, with the exception of Aave, which carries an extended deadline through EoD August 18th, 2026. Participants in DRIP Season 1 can claim their rewards on arbitrumdrip.com.

Ecosystem Data

Arbitrum GTM Support:

The Data Team:

  • DeFi United Dashboard: Built a dedicated dashboard to track contributions and raise awareness for the DeFi United initiative. Beyond supporting the campaign, it serves as a broader signal of Arbitrum’s presence and coordination capacity within the wider DeFi ecosystem.
  • ArbOS 60 Research: Supported Offchain Labs with research and analysis on ArbOS 60, focused on finding the right balance between scalability and long-term revenue sustainability for the network.
  • Onchain Governance Module: Launched the onchain proposal and security council module on arbdata.com, giving delegates and the broader industry a single place to track voting activity, quorum progress, and DAO analytics across Arbitrum governance.

Governance Operations & Other Initiatives

Stylus Sprint

In April, 430,000 ARB was disbursed to teams at an average price of ~$0.109 (~$46,744.60). This brings the total amount of ARB distributed to teams to ~6.86M (76.2% of the 9M budget). The committee has wrapped up its initial review of all milestones, but there are 3 teams working on implementing feedback before payments will be completed. We anticipate that the Stylus Sprint will distribute 7.36M ARB of its budget.

OCL marketing recently released a blog post highlighting StylusPort. They are also finalizing the post for Moving Stylus and have passed along an initial draft of a post to Syndicate for their review.

Watchdog

In April, Entropy published the Watchdog Program 6-Month Retrospective, followed by an April 20th update, which introduced a time-frame limit on eligible reports (effective May 10th at 11:59pm UTC, excluding pre-2025 programs), a 3-month KYC deadline post-case-closure, and confirmation that OpCo will take over some program operations going forward.

We also recently published a month-end update for the program’s finances and total case load as we shift from a mid-month reporting cadence to end-of-month data. The program received 8 new reports, all involving the historic inventive programs and mostly tied to minor administrative errors such as late distributions of user funds to distributor contracts. The committee has now closed nearly all of its outstanding investigations, with only 2 still under review at this moment. The Watchdog Program totals now stand at 86 reports, 67 unique cases, 65 investigations completed (42 valid misuse, 23 not valid), and 457,365 ARB recovered. The working budget sits at ~476,481 ARB.

SeedGov announced an internal restructuring that led the organization to step down from its role in the Watchdog. However, Ministro will continue to fill the same responsibilities, just in an individual capacity. As program manager, Entropy felt that no other actions or replacements were necessary. Additionally, OpCo has been onboarded to the Globaleaks platform and is familiarizing themselves with the system, with the current reviewing committee continuing alongside them through the transition.

Requests from the DAO

Please continue to reach out and pass along requests to Entropy Advisors, or visit our bi-weekly office hours on Tuesdays at 1:15pm EST. Our team is always open to input from DAO members and encourages delegates to use this time to ask Entropy questions regarding any initiative.

Thanks for the update, Entropy. A few questions on the April activity:

Treasury Management

The rsETH exploit response was clearly handled well — zero losses and a fast flag. That said, the incident raises a broader question: does the ATMC have a formalized risk framework for evaluating bridge-related asset exposure in the TM portfolio? The Kelp exploit was an OFT bridge vulnerability, not a lending or AMM risk — and that category of attack surface is expanding as more wrapped/bridged assets enter the portfolio. Is there an internal threshold for how much exposure the TM portfolio can carry to any single bridge or LRT/LST issuer?

On the frozen 30,765 ETH — the constitutional AIP to release it to DeFi United is a significant precedent. The Security Council freezing exploiter funds is one thing; the DAO voting to redistribute them into a third-party recovery initiative is another. What’s the legal review process here? Has outside counsel weighed in on the DAO’s liability exposure if DeFi United fails to fully restore rsETH backing?

Portfolio Concentration

The portfolio now holds ~$5.8M in syrupUSDC and is deploying ~$9.2M into USDai. Combined with existing positions, that’s meaningful concentration in two relatively new yield instruments. What are the rebalancing triggers or loss limits on these positions? Is there a published concentration policy for the TM portfolio, or is this managed at ATMC discretion?

KPK Wind-Down

The update states the KPK wind-down was “driven by efforts to streamline operations and ensure cohesion of deployments across the whole TM portfolio, not the active manager’s net performance.” Can you provide more specifics? What was KPK’s net return during the engagement relative to the passive benchmark? The DAO funded active management — it deserves a performance attribution, not just a statement that performance wasn’t the reason for termination.

Watchdog Program

The program has recovered 457,365 ARB on a working budget of ~476,481 ARB. On a pure cost-recovery basis, that’s roughly 1:1. Is the reviewing committee evaluating the program’s deterrence value beyond direct recoveries? And with the shift to OpCo operations and SeedGov stepping down, is there a transition risk assessment? The institutional knowledge in these investigations is non-trivial.

ArbOS 60

The mention of supporting Offchain Labs on ArbOS 60 research around “scalability vs. long-term revenue sustainability” is interesting but light on detail. Given this directly impacts sequencer revenue, fee structures, and by extension the economic model for ARB holders, is there a plan to publish findings or at least a summary for delegates?

Looking forward to the next update.

-- Robby | Author of Tokédex: The Bible of Tokenomics