Thanks @Entropy for suggesting a plan to make our treasury work. I’ll be voting in favor of this proposal. I like to play it safe with Aave and Lido - the yields are just too good in terms of risk-reward to not have a huge part allocated to them.
Helping grow projects on Arbitrum is important, and I see where everyone is coming from about supporting ecosystem growth. But I also put myself in Entropy’s shoes - this is a lot of money and a huge responsibility. When dealing with treasury funds, prioritizing security and proven protocols is just the right move.
When things start moving and we have a solid foundation, I’d love to see more support for native projects as many folks are suggesting. As @jojo mentioned, we don’t want projects to be incentivized to go to Coinbase or casino-world Solana, but i also see the point of first build a plan on making our money work. We are giving a huge step in the right direction in this proposal.
I’m confident in Camelot too as a user. I’ve used their platform and the experience has been solid. I have no knowledge so far of Fluid but I’m trusting entropy to make the right decision there. I’m gonna trust the process, and this allocation will generate revenue, which is why I’m voting for it.
What I particularly appreciate about this proposal is the clear accountability structure. We’re establishing revocable privileges rather than permanent power.
I also want to mention that I would love those proposals to have the tag proposal, I would have personally read it sooner to share feedback. May also be me being new. I’ll keep my eyes more open.