Lampros DAO Delegate Communication Thread

[Euphoria]

Snapshot Votes

---

1. Approval of STEP 2 Committee’s Preferred Allocations
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.

We trust the committee’s judgment in selecting partners for this round, given their thorough evaluation and strategic focus on stability, liquidity, and risk-adjusted setups.

Building on the success of STEP v1, which delivered strong outcomes, we believe this continued approach will strengthen Arbitrum’s long-term growth and competitive position. The committee’s focus on RWAs and overcoming compliance challenges also reflects a forward-thinking strategy to differentiate Arbitrum in the ecosystem.

---

2. [Non-consitutional]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program
   Voted - Yes to both
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting “Yes to both” in the Snapshot voting.

We are in favour of both topping up and moving leftover funds into the hands of TMC. As we’ve previously expressed, we view this reallocation as a practical response to a time-sensitive funding shortfall, made even more reasonable by the fact that it utilizes unspent, already-allocated funds, avoiding the need to convert additional DAO capital in a volatile market.

That said, this proposal highlights an important operational lesson, the need for standardized, pre-approved mechanisms, such as those that can potentially be handled via the TMC, to address minor or urgent funding gaps without requiring full governance cycles.