The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.
We are voting FOR this proposal in the Snapshot voting.
The current 5% quorum for constitutional proposals has become harder to meet as voter participation has declined and the ARB supply has increased. Lowering the quorum to 4.5% is a practical and necessary adjustment that enables constitutional proposals to move forward without being blocked due to low turnout.
We recognize that this is a short-term fix. As mentioned in our previous comment, we would prefer that this change be reviewed on a fixed timeline before it is implemented, such as after the next six months, so the 4.5% threshold does not become a default standard over time. A fixed review period would help the DAO keep this parameter aligned with actual participation trends.
At the same time, we believe this period should be used to focus on improving overall voter turnout. Ultimately, the goal should not be to continue adjusting thresholds, but to increase participation so that higher quorum levels can be met organically. Strengthening engagement now will give the DAO more flexibility and legitimacy when revisiting this parameter in the future.
Overall, based on the current situation, we support this proposal and look forward to continued discussions around increasing voter participation.