For authors and/or key contributors of these proposals, it would be helpful if you could include a TL;DR of your proposal/discussion in the comments so delegates can review them and prepare their questions for the call.
Please comment below if there are any updates that you wish to share during the call.
Additional Notes
We prioritise all proposals and notable discussions that have more engagement.
The logic of the two weeks is that given the proposal lifecycle (one week on the forum, one week on Snapshot, and then two weeks on Tally). This means that even if a proposal takes the shortest possible route, it will be covered at least at the proposal and Tally stage, or the Snapshot and Tally stage.
For anything that needs a recap, they could be parked after these discussions.
On the Security Council Contender Submissions, I have been actively reviewing the candidate threads and raising due diligence questions around conflict of interest disclosures and succession planning. One pattern worth discussing on the call: several high-profile applications are submitted as organizational entities rather than individuals. It may be worth the community discussing whether the election framework should require named backup representatives as part of formal candidacy documentation, rather than leaving succession as an organizational commitment.
Happy to contribute that thread to the discussion if useful. @OpCo@bear-wang
That’s a fair and important point, @Sinkas opsec is a legitimate concern, especially given the sensitivity of Security Council roles.
To clarify my earlier suggestion: I wasn’t proposing that the named backup representative be publicly disclosed. The intent was more around confidential disclosure to the DAO or election committee so that in a succession scenario, the transition doesn’t get blocked simply because no one formally knows who steps in next.
Knowing the entity is in the council is useful, but if the entity itself faces an internal leadership gap or crisis, the DAO still has no clear escalation path. A confidential backup record could address that without compromising opsec.
Happy to discuss further this seems like an important design question for the election framework.