I’m a bit unsure. I see a well-constructed proposal, but I keep wondering if the DAO should pay for this.
Then, what’s the value of protocols engaging… well that indeed helps the DAO be governed by (somewhat) incentive-aligned actors. But should it be only the dao paying to upskill people?
So, I’m thinking the proposal could be taken a bit further. The idea would be to tighten the “so what” part of this proposal. A few ideas to be explored:
- protocols cover part of the fee
- have a pre-emptive list of protocols interested in hiring for the role
- subsidise a gov analyst to work for minority projects (providing analysis of how proposals impact them)
Something in that direction would help