From a market-oriented standpoint, the Quadratic Accelerator hits all the right notes. It transforms ecosystem funding into an organic experiment and I love it!.
Really aligned with this direction. qacc is the kind of experiment we need more of — market-driven, lean, and focused on real outcomes without relying on artificial support, it’s really interesting how the clear winner of season 1 was x23ai a product that probably all delegates are using.
In most ecosystems, public goods funding ends up rewarding participation or presence, not results. qacc flips that script — it ties funding to actual demand, and that’s the right approach. If no one cares about your project, it doesn’t get resources. Simple.
I also like that this isn’t trying to become a permanent bureaucracy. It’s scoped, targeted, and has clear bounds. Run it, measure it, and decide based on outcomes. That’s exactly how governance experiments should be done — small, measurable, and easy to shut off if it doesn’t work.
From a tokenomics angle, it’s a smart structure. Instead of flooding the market with ARB that gets dumped, it locks it up and releases it only when there’s traction. That protects token value while still incentivizing builders.
Fully support trying this out. (,
)