Thank you for the offer, I like the principle of the ABC model itself, but there are many questions:
- In essence, this is a parallel investment, in addition to another project - AVI
Why not combine these programs?
If we invest money in projects, then we can launch them through ABC pools, which will give us a guarantee that the project tokens will not be dumped - Why will new projects choose Arbitrum if there are other more well-known and chain-independent products:
– Balancer LBP (where there is a different principle with a gradual decrease in cost, but also protects against dumping)
– Sushi MISO (with different principles to choose from, but also with the ability to protect against dumping)
What advantages do we provide? - For how long will such a pool be created, and will there be a limit for the project initial release on other projects?
- On finances:
– why pay projects that have not lost the value of their tokens for the withdrawal of funds to DEX due to the Arbitration?
- why are we spending 17% of funding on Development & Deployment. This is too much expense. In addition, if this principle has already been implemented for several projects, then the code base has already been developed, what will this money be spent on - $ 170,000?
- what are the overhead costs? What is needed for as much as 80,000 odllars?
- why were the amounts of $ 50,000 chosen for the project. What should the project be assessed at, that it only needs $ 50,000 for liquidity?