Thank you all for the attention, feedback, and for voting!
The offchain vote has ended with the following results:
We kindly appreciate your input and will be evaluating our next steps.
In the meantime, make sure to enjoy all the functionality that we were proposing to integrate in this forum, and much more, in arbitrum.proposals.app
Thank you all! 
I voted FOR on this proposal. The author was willing to adapt the financial terms following the delegates’ feedback and the cost presented in the vote was something I was willing to support for what it delivers.
After consideration, the @SEEDgov delegation decided to vote AGAINST (refrain from implementing these three integrations) on this proposal at the Snapshot Vote.
We’d like to recognize the work Paulo and Andrei have put into proposals.app. One of the features we value most is the ability to view and track every phase of a proposal in one place—this significantly improves transparency and makes it easier to evaluate changes over time.
Nevertheless, we agree with other delegates that this is a nice-to-have feature with a high maintenance cost due to the business model proposed. As @JoJo pointed out, expanding the adoption across multiple DAOs could help distribute those costs and make the tool more affordable.
We keep asking, “How do we widen the delegate bench?” The answer starts with lowering the cognitive cost of showing up. Live results + inbox nudges + who-is-who nametags move us from information scavenger hunt to one-stop governance dashboard.
Impact snapshot
| Concern | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Sticker-shock on $120 k/2 yrs | Pay yearly; DAO can cancel if KPIs under-deliver. |
| Potential bias from power tags | Toggle visibility + display Karma score for nuance. |
Publish a public Trello (or similar) with sprint demos & feedback threads so non-tech delegates can follow progress.
One Other note: I know this proposal did not pass but I’d love to see another version of it with a decreased cost where we can run a smaller experiment.
