Thanks to @paulofonseca for bringing this proposal, as it encompasses the “eat your own dog food” mindset that each organization should have and aims to solve the common problems regarding call scheduling. Nonetheless, I believe there needs to be a larger testing session, as the DAO, given its decentralized and distributed traits, has in its meetings the main “public square forum” for communicating proposals and breaking down ideas with their authors.
Considering the relevance of this change, I propose a there should be a larger testing period frame, in which there should be an evaluation of the two apps (the tried and true Google Meet, and the new Huddle alternative) at least for a month to compare and evaluate if such a change is necessary and beneficial. In this period, there should be alternate calls using the two alternatives for this evaluation.
While the test recording posted seems clear and @paulofonseca has personally tested it, other delegates including @danielo have presented their experiences with the app, stating that they had to abandon its usage due to the issues that added friction to the process of just attending a meeting, that should be as seamless as possible. As with every app that needs to be implemented into a multitude of users, testing thoroughly is really important, as what is acceptable/good/usable for one cannot be generally translated to others.