[Non-Constitutional] Let's get our huddles (aka. video calls) in order

[paulofonseca]

good points @Chris_Areta I’ve reworked the proposal a little bit. looking at the next calls on the calendar I think we can do a test for 2 weeks only and cover most of the different recurring calls we do.

So here is the revised proposal timeline:

@paulofonseca

Until April 7th – Get social consensus here in the forum to see if there is alignment on moving forward with this idea, and execute step 2 outlined above.
Between April 7th and 22nd – If there’s social consensus, execute step 3 of the implementation steps above to test out the new setup with all delegates in all types of calls already scheduled in the calendar. These 2 weeks should be enough to cover all different calls we do, including the security council election call.
Between April 22nd and 24th – Decide if we should put up to a vote a policy to enforce video calls in Arbitrum DAO to be done via Huddle01 Meet and/or for the recordings of those calls to be stored in IPFS.
On April 24th – If so, create a policy to proceed to a temperature check offchain voting on Snapshot to ratify the decision.
Between April 24th and May 1st – Policy content available for discussion here in the forum
On May 1st – Post the offchain vote on Snapshot.

Also, I think we can just ratify this with an offchain vote, if the @Arbitrum Foundation would pay this subscription (like they’ve done before for 10x this amount) so we wouldn’t need to go to an onchain vote and spend funds from the DAOs treasury.