I did not realize this was an issue. This was 100% because I asked Griff to take it down and I should take responsibility.
These are the reasons I thought it was not a problem to ask for it to be taken down:
- Data isn’t lost - Griff posted the screens and the original ask.
- Data isn’t lost - The data is on IPFS
- Legitimacy - I didn’t see anything saying not to do this in the constitution
- Legitimacy - Snapshot is a “temp check” according to the constitution, not a vote
- Intended outcome - Even if it passed, we would not have put it to Tally knowing there wasn’t broad support
Honestly, I had no clue this would be an issue. In some DAOs where Snapshot is considered a vote, I would never think of doing this. I thought the “temp check” is clear and explicit. No harm intended.
I only see “this is bad practice” as a reason to not do it.
I don’t really agree or disagree with the logic, but I respect your voice here. Can you help me understand what problem it might cause?