OpCo – A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution

Answering to the open question, I think this approach is very responsible and a good way forward. Being the scope of OpCo supporting the DAO through operations and organisation, I think going for the safer, financially sustainable approach is the right decision.

To echo JoJo, my only concern is on feasibility. If it hasn’t been done already, I would suggest to “simulate” the steps needed to make this happen.

1 Like

Based on feedback we’ve received within the past seven days or so, we’ve made the following edits to the proposal on December 4th, 2024:

  • Slight modifications to the text to clarify that with the exception of the Investments initiative category and any emerging future categories wherein other, new DAO-adjacent legal entities are set to operate, OpCo can be expanded into any current/future initiative categories through a governance vote.
  • We’ve decreased the proposal’s ask from 35M to 22M ARB and added the upfront ARB liquidation structure as follows:
  • To further prevent the risk of OpCo capturing governance, we’ve included the below additional restrictions:
  • We’ve added text to clarify that OpCo will not have the authority to enter into contracts with service providers or individual contributors for strategies not approved by the DAO through governance, unless directly related to its operational needs (e.g., hiring an accounting firm).

Please note that barring additional major edits, this proposal will move to Snapshot on December 12th, 2024.

1 Like