RWA is an important direction for the future, and this collaboration with NFT Paris is a great opportunity for Arbitrum to build a bridge between traditional finance and Web3. However, based on the Arbitrum D.A.O. Grant Program - Season 3 proposal [Non-Constitutional] [RFC] Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3, it seems the timing may not align.
Additionally, I have some questions about the KPIs. For example:
• The goal of 1,000,000 brand impressions sounds good, but more specific actionable metrics might be more meaningful, such as how many institutions agree to pilot RWA solutions or how many participants express interest in testing on Arbitrum.
• For the breakfast interaction goal (200 participants), it would be better to specify whether there will be speeches or discussion content, rather than just open networking.
I suggest tracking new institutional connections after the event, clarifying follow-up plans with content and timelines to ensure actionable results instead of simply ending the interactions.
The total budget could also be further detailed, such as specific arrangements for main stage branding or the detailed costs for breakfast (venue, catering, branding setup, etc.), to make it easier for the community to understand how the funds are being spent.
It is necessary to further optimize KPI practicality, post-event follow-up mechanisms, and community engagement to ensure the maximum return on investment.