Proposal: Count ARB Balance in QiDao Vaults into Voting Power

[fred]

I believe there was a similar proposal previously for counting voting power from multiple vaults.

Proposal: Include LPs in Gov Voting

Category: Non-Constitutional AIPs Submitted by: Ceazor Abstract This document proposes that a list of accepted Liquidity Positions starts to be compiled with the ultimate goal of including them as legitimate votable positions. Motivation DeFi is the life line of any chain. And forcing governance tokens to be held in spot is not only behind the times, but also weakens the durability of the token itself. We should encourage the deepening of the ARB token liquidity, but be selective on what is…

What do you think of that particular proposal and potentially including QiDao in it alongside other protocols?

Also one of the suggestions was using Flexible Voting’s approach in order to achieve that. Do you hold any thoughts around that?

Proposal: Include LPs in Gov Voting

All of the LP positions with $ARB are token holders who own governance rights. I don’t think selectivity is fair or legitimate to attach to voting rights. I would support using Flexible Voting. As for the intention of rewarding LPs in a selective way, we could do an AIP asking for 365k $arb and use quadratic voting to decide which LP positions to reward. This is just an off the top of my head idea, but i like it better than being selective in this way about voting rights.

Would be awesome to get your input there.