Proposal: Extend AGV Council Term and Align Future Elections with Operational Cadence

[Tane]

We vote for this proposal.

This proposal aligns well with our stance on maintaining operational efficiency at this critical stage.
We previously expressed concerns about operational disruptions and knowledge loss, and we appreciate that the revised proposal effectively incorporates those considerations. The proposed approach of overlapping council terms ensures smoother transitions and continuity without increasing unnecessary operational burdens.

@ArbitrumGaming

We agree with the concerns raised by @Tane, @cp0x, @Michigan_Blockchain and @Ignas about the risk of operational stagnation and knowledge loss if the full Council transitions at once.

@Tane

Transitioning the entire Council simultaneously significantly elevates the risk of operational stagnation and knowledge loss…

@cp0x

It might be worth considering a staggered term model… to preserve continuity and allow for a gradual transition between cohorts.

Our initial proposal focused on reducing the operational burden that staggered elections and multiple onboarding cycles would create for a small team like AGV. That said, we fully recognize the need for a smooth transition process.