I fully support your point of view regarding possible overlaps in the areas of responsibility of similar committees.
It is necessary that the DAO do not drown in the abyss of bureaucracy.
1 Like
Having followed this discussion and proposal, I voted yes in Snapshot. Updating the compensation amount from 7500 ARB to $8000 seems reasonable. Also, perhaps itās better to disallow member re-election in two consecutive terms within a 12-month period. Or any other variations of this idea that make sense. We can always hold a new vote to allow re-election in case itās needed.
Centralization concerns voiced by some here also make sense. Iād be keen to try the ADPC idea to keep advancing the DAO, and reassess near end of term to make potential adjustments.
6 Likes
Iām really sorry I missed the deadline for the snapshot vote, Iām sick and on medication and was certain that the deadline is today evening. Anyway, Iād like to signal our support to this proposal as weāll be voting for it if it goes for onchain vote.
The below response reflects the views of L2BEATās governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and itās based on the combined research, fact-checking and ideation of the two.
Weāll be voting in favour of the proposal during temp-check as we believe itās important to establish a framework to procure services from different providers depending on the DAOās needs.
While there will always be ways in which such a proposal can be improved, weāre comfortable enough with its current state and weāre happy to see most of the concerns initially raised by delegates having been addressed since its first iteration.
5 Likes
It seems clear to me based on prior proposals and discussions the DAO would prefer a committee approach to these types of issues over just voting on each individual proposal. I have largely agreed with this as well.
As such, I have voted to for this as this is the logical next step and the proposal here seems to be reasonable. With any proposal of this nature, I would just urge that all those involved provide feedback after the 6-month window on what worked / what didnāt work so we can adjust in the future.
Edit 2/2/2024: Edit to add that I just now voted for this for the reasons noted here. Look forward to seeing what this committee can do!
5 Likes
Thankyou all for your comments and feedback!
@olimpio , can you reach out to me via TG on @immutablelawyer [Iād like to discuss term caps, terms and conditions applicable etc.]
2 Likes
As the ITUBlockchain examined this proposal, here are our thoughts:
It is considered logical for the Committee to select members with an in-depth knowledge of ArbitrumDAOās activities and at least 3 years of experience in legal, operational, or administrative roles to assess the eligibility of projects for financing through the financial constitution test. This would contribute to the effective management of the initial processes. As part of the delegation team, we support this approach. If Arbitrum is funding from its own revenue, it would be suitable for the hired individuals to be insiders. However, in keeping with our commitment to decentralization, we propose that at least one delegate going forward be elected from outside the DAO and have in-depth knowledge of Arbitrum governance. This approach will contribute to a more decentralized structure by encouraging diversity and innovation. We would like to express our gratitude to the team that prepared the proposal.
5 Likes
The below response reflects the views of L2BEATās governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and itās based on the combined research, fact-checking and ideation of the two.
As mentioned in our previous comment, weāll be voting in favour of establishing the procurement committee during the on-chain vote. We also recently casted our vote in the ADPC elections on Snapshot and weāre looking forward to completing the governance process so we can see the committee in action.
One thing to note however that is not included in the proposal itself is that at the end of the term weād like to see some sort of a report on the committeeās performance carried out by an independent third party and funded by the DAO. Perhaps the budget allocated to the proposal as a buffer could be used to pay for the report if it remains unused at the end of the 6 month period
7 Likes
I voted for this proposal on Tally because I think itās important for the DAO to be able to move forward in hiring service providers for key functions, and because Iām comfortable with the framework outlined.
2 Likes
After consideration Treasureās Arbitrum Representative Council (ARC) would like to share the following feedback on the proposal
In line with our previous voting we support the creation of a procurement committee. We cast our vote in support of a number of candidates in the recent ADPD election and look forward to see the elected group execute on behalf of the DAO.
1 Like