I voted FOR this proposal. Stylus is one of the key tech advancements of the Arbitrum ecosystem, and we as delegates must incentivize the activity of worthy projects to use these tools to build infrastructure and apps on top of Arbitrum.
While this proposal does double the budget of the Stylus Sprint proposal approved earlier, the committee evaluated and rated these projects as promising in a pool of 147 applications. I see no reason to not support them given the recommendation and the relevance of these proposals.
I also oppose the suggestion of opening another round for more projects to be included. This would complicate the committee’s selection even more. Another proposal for a similar initiative might be opened later to include these, and evaluated more thoroughly with a more relaxed timeframe.
For me, approving this is essential, even with the high investment this activity encompasses.